Kant's Neglected Objection to the Ontological Argument

Abstract

This paper argues that Kant’s most famous objection to the ontological argument – that existence is not a real predicate – is not, in fact, his most effective objection, and that his ‘neglected objection’ to the argument deserves to be better known. It shows that Kant clearly anticipates William Rowe’s later objection that the argument begs the question, and discusses why Kant himself seems to have overlooked the force of this criticism in his attempt to demolish the traditional proofs for God’s existence.