God, Elvish, and Secondary Creation

Authors

  • Andrew Pinsent Oxford University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v11i2.2620

Abstract

According to the theological worldview of J. R. R. Tolkien, the principal work of a Christian is to know, love, and serve God. Why, then, did he devote so much time to creating an entire family of imaginary languages for imaginary peoples in an imaginary world? This paper argues that the stories of these peoples, with their ‘eucatastrophes,’ have consoling value amid the incomplete stories of our own lives. But more fundamentally, secondary creation is proper to the adopted children of God and can be a way of drawing closer to God. Such work also witnesses to the freedom of the children of God, not only to receive salvation from God, but to contribute to the enrichment of creation and eternal life.

References

Aristotle, and Jonathan Barnes. 2014. Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume 2: The Revised Oxford Translation. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

Bates, Elizabeth, Luigia Camaioni, and Virginia Volterra. 1975. “The Acquisition of Performatives Prior to Speech”. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development 21, no. 3: 205–26.

Birzer, Bradley J., and Joseph Pearce. 2003. J.R.R. Tolkien’s Sanctifying Myth: Understanding Middle Earth. Wilmington: ISI Books.

Bruner, Jerome, Carolyn Roy, and Nancy Ratner. 1978. “The Beginnings of Request”. In Children’s Language, edited by Keith E. Nelson, 91–138. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bruner, Jerome, and Rita Watson. 1983. Child’s Talk: Learning to Use Language. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Butterworth, G. 1991. “The Ontogeny and Phylogeny of Joint Visual Attention”. In Natural Theories of Mind: Evolution, Development and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading, edited by Andrew Whiten, 223–32. Oxford: Blackwell.

Catholic Treasury. From the “Penny Catechism”. Accessed May 1, 2018. http://www.catholictreasury.info/catechism/cat1.php.

Eilan, Naomi, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack, and Johannes Roessler. 2005. Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Meltzoff, Andrew N., and M. K. Moore. 1977. “Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates”. Science 198, no. 4312: 75–78.

Nagel, Thomas. 1974. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?”. The Philosophical Review 83, no. 4: 435. doi:10.2307/2183914.

Pinsent, Andrew. 2012. The Second-Person Perspective in Aquinas’s Ethics: Virtues and Gifts. New York: Routledge.

Russell, Bertrand. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. London: Williams & Norgate.

Tolkien, J. R. R.. 2011. The Fellowship of the Ring, New edition. London: HarperCollins

—. 2014. On Fairy-Stories. Expanded ed., with commentary and notes. Edited by Verlyn Flieger and Douglas A. Anderson. London: HarperCollins.

Trevarthen, Colwyn. 1979. “Communication and Cooperation in Early Infancy: A Description of Primary Intersubjectivity”. In Before Speech: The Beginning of Interpersonal Communication, edited by Margaret Bullowa, 321–72. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-20

How to Cite

Pinsent, Andrew. 2019. “God, Elvish, and Secondary Creation”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (2):191-204. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v11i2.2620.