Hope: The Janus-faced virtue (with feathers)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v11i3.2935Keywords:
Hope, Religion, Virtue, Desire, Wish-fulfillmentAbstract
In this essay we argue for the Janus-faced nature of hope. We show that attempts to sanitise the concept of hope either by separating it conceptually from other phenomena such as wishful thinking, or, more generally, by seeking to minimise the negative aspects of hope, do not help us to understand the nature of hope and its functions as regards religion. Drawing on functional accounts of religion from Clifford Geertz and Tamas Pataki, who both—in their different ways—see the function of religion in terms of its capacity to satisfy deep psychological needs, we demonstrate that religion uniquely positions itself with regard to hope’s two faces, simultaneously exploiting positive and negative aspects of hope.
References
Audi, Robert. 2000. Religious Commitment and Secular Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Berger, Peter L. 1990. Sacred canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York: Doubleday.
Bovens, Luc. 1999. “The Value of Hope”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59, no. 3: 667–81. doi:10.2307/2653787.
Brown, Wendy. 2006. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Butler, Judith. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
Cox, Damian, Michael Levine, and Saul Newman. 2009. Politics Most Unusual. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Day, J. P. 1969. “Hope”. American Philosophical Quarterly 6, no. 2: 89–102.
Dickinson, Emily. 1830-1886. “Hope is the Thing with Feathers (254)”. Accessed September 5, 2017. https://poets.org/poem/hope-thing-feathers-254.
Freud, Sigmund. 1961. The Future of an Illusion. New York, NY: W.W. Norton and Company.
Geertz, Clifford. 1971. “Religion as a Cultural System”. In The Interpretation of Cultures, 87–125. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Kadlac, Adam. 2017. “Hope(s) and Hopefulness”. American Philosophical Quarterly 54, no. 3: 209–21.
Kierkegaard, Soren. 2000. “Either / Or, A Fragment of Life, I”. In The Essential Kierkegaard, edited by Hong, Howard V., Hong, Edna H. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
—. 2009. Works of Love. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
McGeer, Victoria. 2004. “The Art of Good Hope”. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 592, no. 1: 100–127. doi:10.1177/0002716203261781.
Pataki, Tamas. 2007. Against God. Melbourne: Scribe Books.
—. 2014. Wish-fulfilment in Philosophy and Psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
Riceour, Paul. 1985. “Evil: A Challenge to Philosophy and Theology”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 53, no. 4: 635–48.
Rorty, Amélie. 1988. “The Historicity of Psychological Attitudes: Love Is Not Love Which Alters Not When It Alteration Finds”. In Mind in Action: Essays in the Philosophy of Mind, 121–34. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Smith, Nicholas. 2010. “From the Concept of Hope to the Principle of Hope”. In Hope after Hope, edited by Rochelle Green and Janet Horrigan, 3–22. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Tillich, Paul. 1965. “The Right to Hope”. Neue Zeitschrift Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 7, no. 3: 371–77.
Walker, Margaret 2006. “Hope’s Value”. In Moral Repair, edited by Margaret Walker, 40–71. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511618024.002.
Wollheim, Richard. 1999. On the Emotions. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth. 1996. The Anatomy of Prejudices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
