Confucianism, Buddhism, and Virtue Ethics

Authors

  • Bradford Cokelet University of Miami

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v8i1.75

Abstract

Are Confucian and Buddhist ethical views closer to Kantian, Consequentialist, or Virtue Ethical ones? How can such comparisons shed light on the unique aspects of Confucian and Buddhist views? Oriented by these questions, this essay tackles three tasks: provides a historically grounded framework for distinguishing western ethical theories, identifies a series of questions that we can ask in order to clarify the philosophic accounts of ethical motivation embedded in the Buddhist and Confucian traditions, and critiques Lee Ming-huei’s claim that Confucianism is closer to Kantianism than virtue ethics and Charles Goodman’s claim that Buddhism is closer to Consequentialism than Virtue Ethics.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-21

How to Cite

Cokelet, Bradford. 2016. “Confucianism, Buddhism, and Virtue Ethics”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8 (1):187-214. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v8i1.75.